Many pensioners, because of minimum pensions, need to find a job after retirement, usually paid in order not to lower the black board. But since we live in a country where the illegal becomes legal, thanks to a law, regulation of this combination of work and retirement provided an opportunity to those who want to continue working after retirement, without giving the whole or a large share of the pension. The decree law number 112 of 25 June 2008 provides that from 1 January 2009, old age pensions in pay scheme will be eligible for full cumulation that was previously in force but only for pensions vecchiaia.Lo original purpose was to to return to tax the income of many retirees who worked in black, but what is happening is extraordinarily Italian: the employee is fired, asked the board, and after a short time (usually 30 days), it is summed up by the company. In this way it can benefit both retirement and salary. But they are not old pensioners with the minimum pension benefit from the opportunity, those who are using are almost exclusively those who have senior positions. Most people, in fact, are not aware of this "chance", my question is, even if they do (know) a worker or an employee would have the bargaining power and persuasion to convince the company they work for accept their resignations, and then summarize them? I think not.
So, first we have to layoff workers and employees, other managers who are doubling their incomes at the expense of the community!
is also a privileged opportunity that only those who retire with the pay arrangements (ie, the calculation is done on their last salary, not on what they have paid during working life). The result is that not only those already privileged by the current situation has an additional privilege, but it is also to take a job at the expense of unemployed youth. To add insult to injury: This period applies to salary plus pension the calculation of contributions. That is, after a few years, those who are not retired with full, request that the pension is recalculated because in the meantime has paid other contributions (essentially with our money) and ask the board massima.Ora, parliamentarians who have decided to approve This decree would ask to what extent they want to increase the gap between rich and poor, to what extent they want to starve the population. I would remind them that a population that struggles to make ends meet has nothing to lose, "is not the absolute deprivation that leads to protest, but the relative deprivation, ie the discrepancy between the conditions of life where individuals are subjected and the they think could realistically be achieved "(James Davies).
is also a privileged opportunity that only those who retire with the pay arrangements (ie, the calculation is done on their last salary, not on what they have paid during working life). The result is that not only those already privileged by the current situation has an additional privilege, but it is also to take a job at the expense of unemployed youth. To add insult to injury: This period applies to salary plus pension the calculation of contributions. That is, after a few years, those who are not retired with full, request that the pension is recalculated because in the meantime has paid other contributions (essentially with our money) and ask the board massima.Ora, parliamentarians who have decided to approve This decree would ask to what extent they want to increase the gap between rich and poor, to what extent they want to starve the population. I would remind them that a population that struggles to make ends meet has nothing to lose, "is not the absolute deprivation that leads to protest, but the relative deprivation, ie the discrepancy between the conditions of life where individuals are subjected and the they think could realistically be achieved "(James Davies).
0 comments:
Post a Comment