In the past, women have fought for rights and freedoms such as the right of ownership, voting rights, birth control, exercise of certain professions. Today I am saddened at having to repeat, with a post, the absolute equality between people and the maximum reduction of the border that separates male from female. Women want to be considered as persons and not a category "woman" as a group separate from the rest the world. But the question shows some inconsistencies and it is likely to have a distorted view of the problem if it is approached from this unique perspective. In the '70s and '80s, women have occupied important positions and social barriers have disintegrated, and today, although with some caution, who can deny that women will achieve any social position quite easily? In 1776, John Adams called it "unfit to practice and experience the great questions of life" because of our sensitivity, in 2009 the prime minister said during a conference: "I see there at the forefront of high level representatives of aesthetics. You know you are in love with my wife, but I did not lose the aesthetic sense and known extraordinary legs moving ... "We are facing a decline in the way that many men consider a woman? Today men are just more honest? Despite the attacks, more or less inelegant we are sure that this is the real problem? A My dear friend one day told me "you women are not creative you are ... had to create an alternative to being a man without becoming clones. "For a moment I was born a heated discussion, but then made me think. All of the feminist struggle is legitimate concentarata equality between men and women who at the time was absolutely necessary, but now it is perhaps not too flattened the question? We did not push, exaggerated with the desire to at all costs to join a male model seeking social equality and equal treatment? We had perhaps a chance to create something different, cleaner, not blindly adhered to the current economic model? We simply aspired to be like them. Women in power, not all but many align themselves visually and behavior to humans, reducing themselves to be sempilicemente of people but not women in power. How did Condoleezza Rice, a woman, not to find peaceful solutions to the conflict in Iraq? Not because it was a woman, but just denying her being a woman and acting like a man, was unable to find another solution. This is the point of view from which a riflessione.Ultimamente there is much talk of women between the means of mass communication and is emerging the need to return to a kind of feminist revival. I suspect that the problem is not that person's gender determines the involution of the human species, I think it's social, economic and social system upon which our existence is the real defendant. The economic system indoctrinate us since childhood. E 'toys that the economic system as corrupt us. And if you are a parent, please give away your children's books and not the "Bratz". Disgraziatamnete If you happen to have two parents who, perhaps because of carelessness, you got all your books and childhood development, then welcome to the world of "Unfit", "working girl lonely, desperate and deviant" who seek a world of tissue paper and tissue to find their own way. The economic system is not interressato to form the morale of a people, is only interested in business. How does a population base the entire office in the gaming business? I do not see differences between men and women, in this case we only lost people in their abandonment. A warm "welcome" in the realm of howler monkeys.
0 comments:
Post a Comment